Simulation
Predictions depend on the configured source, channel, geometry, storage and timing. Scenario 3 evaluates the full PF construction on Scenario 2’s physical schedule.
Experiment design
Configure your simulation
Choose the study purpose, inspect its physical scenario, then select compatible quantum experiments.
Preset loaded
Scenario and apparatus
Experiments on this physical mission
Quantum experiments
Each experiment receives the executed mission's full quantum state and physical inputs. Selection does not supply missing hardware. Results report “Not applicable” or “Unavailable” with a reason when prerequisites are absent.
Declare installed apparatus
These settings describe hardware you assume is available. Memory constants, processing delays, exposure and protocol parameters remain editable in the mission quantum configuration section below.
Live satellite tracking
Current UTC simulation presets already update the quantum scenarios. Loading a live orbit comparison preset starts a different study for model and SGP4 trajectories. It replaces topology, ground stations, satellite IDs, quantum settings, other inputs, run options and run name; only the effective Flat SR or Static GR choice is carried over.
Changes are applied when you leave this tab, validate, export or run. JSON does not permit NaN or Infinity.
Checking your personal profile…
Execution history
Runs and live progress
Jobs run locally. Select a run to inspect its log, results and saved inputs.
Run history updates automatically. Refresh checks the selected run and its saved results now.
Select a run
Execution state is separate from benchmark validation.
Select a run to inspect its execution phase.
Select a run to view its output.
Completion means the command finished. Scientific pass/fail and empirical agreement are reported separately in Results.
Evidence and interpretation
Results explorer
Select a completed run to explore its outputs.
Your results will appear here
Run a workflow, then select it in Runs. All saved outputs remain available for inspection.
Conditional quantum state quality, collected counts, security budgets and agreement with published data are different quantities. A successful command does not establish empirical agreement or a PF advantage.
Scientific companion studies
Derived from this saved runRun applicable independent engines using the recorded configuration and outputs. Each study retains its parent hashes and physical assumptions.
Mission quantum experiments
Recorded physical inputs and applicabilityDiagnostic guidance
Review assumptions before changing settingsResearch data, risk and uncertainty
Conditional predictions and declared evidenceScope and limitations
Figures and visual outputs
Reports and documents
Saved outputs
Reference library
Documentation and environment
Installation, scientific assumptions, configuration reference and interpretation of the results.
Package documents
Start with the end-user manual: Chapter 22 covers the workbench and Chapter 32 walks through ISAES reports, evidence and optional AI review. Documents open in a separate tab; Markdown guides display as readable source text.
Local environment
Use the desktop launcher to install or repair required dependencies. Live tracking also requires network access and current supporting data.
Read each result in its proper context
Numerical benchmarks
A numerical pass checks an implementation or reference calculation. It is not an experimental validation of a mission, quantum security implementation or preferred frame.
Published experiments
Published measurements may be incomplete or use a different analysis. Partial agreement and unresolved reproduction remain visible; they are not converted to passes.
Recommendations
Suggestions explain identifiable input, data or physical constraints. They do not automatically relax validation thresholds, security parameters or scientific assumptions.